Comparison of State Unemployment Insurance Laws
2008
EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE
RELATIONSHIP
Most
state laws contain strict tests to determine whether there is sufficient absence
of control by an employer that the worker is not an employee, but an independent
contractor. More than half the
states provide criteria commonly called the “ABC” test under which service
for remuneration is considered employment and the worker is an employee unless
each of three tests are passed:
 |
The
worker is free from control or direction in the performance of the work
under the contract of service and in fact; |
 |
The
service is performed either outside the usual course of the business for
which it is performed or is performed outside of all places of business of
the enterprise for which it is performed; and |
 |
The individual is customarily engaged in
an independent trade, occupation, profession or business. |
Other states have
variations of this “ABC” test. For
example, in some states only the “A” and “C” tests apply.
The tests used in states are listed in the table below.
|
EMPLOYEE:
WORKERS CONSIDERED EMPLOYEES UNLESS:
|
State
|
Workers free from control over performance
(A)
|
Service
outside regular course or place of employer’s business
(B) |
Worker
in an independent business
(C) |
Other
tests
|
|
State
Related Resources
(Provided By Corporate Aviators, Inc.)
|
|
AK
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
AK
|
|
|
AL
|
|
|
|
Master-servant
1/ |
|
AL
|
|
|
AR
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
AR
|
|
|
AZ
|
|
|
|
Service
per-formed by an employee for the entity employing him. |
|
AZ
|
|
|
CA
|
|
|
|
Contract
of hire, written or oral, express or implied. 2/ |
|
CA
|
IC
Misconceptions
Employee or IC
Employment Determination |
|
CO
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
CO
|
|
|
CT
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
CT
|
CT ABC Test |
|
DC
|
|
|
|
Contract
of hire, written or oral, express or implied; by regulation
|
|
DC
|
|
|
DE
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
DE
|
|
|
FL
|
|
|
|
2/ |
|
FL
|
FL Employment
Information |
|
GA
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
GA
|
GA Employment
Test |
|
HI
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
HI
|
|
|
IA
|
X |
|
|
Contract
of hire, written or oral, express or implied. |
|
IA
|
|
|
ID
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
ID
|
|
|
IL
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
IL
|
IL ABC Test |
|
IN
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
IN
|
IN Employment
Test |
|
KS
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
KS
|
|
|
KY
|
|
|
|
Master-servant
1/ By judicial
interpretation. |
|
KY
|
|
|
LA
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
LA
|
|
|
MA
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
MA
|
MA ABC Test |
|
MD
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
MD
|
MD Employment
Test |
|
ME
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
ME
|
|
|
MI
|
X |
|
|
Contract
of hire, written or oral, express or implied. |
|
MI
|
MI Employment |
|
MN
|
|
|
X |
Master-servant
1/ |
|
MN
|
|
|
MO
|
|
|
|
Common
law of right to control. |
|
MO
|
|
|
MS
|
X |
|
|
Master-servant
1/ |
|
MS
|
|
|
MT
|
|
|
|
Works under approved IC exemption certificate. |
|
MT
|
|
|
NC
|
|
|
|
Contract
creating employee relationship. |
|
NC
|
|
|
ND
|
|
|
|
20-factor test |
|
ND
|
|
|
NE
|
X |
X |
X |
Contract
creating employee relationship. |
|
NE
|
NE ABC Test |
|
NH
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
NH
|
NH ABC Test |
|
NJ
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
NJ
|
NJ ABC Test |
|
NM
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
NM
|
|
|
NV
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
NV
|
NV ABC Test |
|
NY
|
|
|
|
Contract
of hire, written or oral, express or implied. |
|
NY
|
IC
Determination
NYS Guide
IC Pamphlet IA 318.14
NY Gov. Exec. Order |
|
OH
|
X |
|
|
Contract
of hire, written or oral, express or implied. |
|
OH
|
OH Employment
Test |
|
OK
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
OK
|
|
|
OR
|
X |
|
X
|
|
|
OR
|
|
|
PA
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
PA
|
|
|
PR
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
PR
|
|
|
RI
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
RI
|
|
|
SC
|
|
|
|
Contract
of hire, written or oral, express or implied. |
|
SC
|
|
|
SD
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
SD
|
|
|
TN
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
TN
|
|
|
TX
|
|
|
|
Common
law. |
|
TX
|
TX Employment
Test |
|
UT
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
UT
|
|
|
VA
|
|
|
|
20-factor test |
|
VA
|
VA Employment |
|
VI
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
VI
|
|
|
VT
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
VT
|
|
|
WA
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
WA
|
WA Employment Test |
|
WI
|
|
|
|
Statutory
factors 3/
|
|
WI
|
|
|
WV
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
WV
|
|
|
WY
|
X |
|
|
4/ |
|
WY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/
Refers generally to the employer’s right of direction and
control.
2/
In addition to the A, B, and C tests, the following tests are
considered: 1) in locality,
work is usually done by specialist without supervision; 2) specialized
skill is required in the particular occupation; 3) length of time for
which person is employed suggests an independent relationship; 4) method
of payment is the by the job rather than by time; 5) parties do not
believe they are creating a master and servant relationship, and 6)
principal is not in business; 7)
CA: principal does not supply the instrumentalities, tools, and the
place of work for the person doing the work. 3/
Direction and control and independent business (i.e. AC) test used
for governmental and nonprofit entities and loggers and truckers.
4/
Individual must represent services to the public as being in
self-employment or as an independent contractor, and individual must be
able to substitute another individual to perform services. |
EMPLOYMENT
SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED
State
exclusions from employment generally follow the FUTA exclusions.
However, the states often exclude other types of employment as well. This section presents a brief discussion of each of the
exclusions which occur in all or nearly all the state laws. A
great many miscellaneous exclusions, which occur in only a few states and
affect relatively small groups, are not included.
The following table provides an overview of some of the basic
exclusions from the definition of employment used by states.
|
SIGNIFICANT
MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYMENT EXCLUSIONS
|
|
State
|
Insurance
Agents On
Commission
|
Real
estate
Agents on
Commission
|
Casual
Labor
Not in Course of Employer’s Business
|
Part-Time
Service for Nonprofit Organizations Exempt from Federal Income Tax 1/
|
|
AL
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
AK
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X 1/ 2/
|
|
AZ
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
AR
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
CA
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
CO
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
CT
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
DE
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
DC
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
FL
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
GA
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
HI
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
2/
|
|
ID
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
IL
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
IN
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
IA
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
KS
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
KY
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
LA
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
ME
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
1/
|
|
MD
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
MA
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
MI
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
MN
|
X
3/
|
X
3/
|
X
|
|
|
MS
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
MO
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
MT
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
NE
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
NV
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
NH
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
NJ
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
NM
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
NY
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
NC
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
ND
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
OH
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
OK
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
OR
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
PA
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
PR
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
RI
|
X
3/
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
SC
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
SD
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
TN
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
TX
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
UT
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
VT
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
VA
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
VI
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
WA
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
WV
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
WI
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
WY
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
1/
In all states this exclusion is limited to remuneration of less
than $50 in any calendar quarter , except in AK, (less than $250)
and ME (less than
$150).
2/ Does not exclude just
part-time service.
3/
RI does not exclude such service if performed for a corporation or
by industrial and debit insurance agents; MN does not exclude
such service if performed by a corporate officer.
|
*Reference:
www.ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/uilawcompar/2008/comparison2008.asp
The information provided on this page is for
informational purposes and is not intended as legal
or accounting advice and should not be used as a substitution for
consultation with professional legal or accounting advisors. We
have made every attempt to ensure that the information
contained herein has been obtained from reliable
sources. Copyright 2006
Corporate Aviators, Inc. All rights reserved
|